NEWS

HOME ꄲ NEWS ꄲ LCL Operation Tips and Common Customs Clearance Issues! FCL vs. LCL Cost Comparison

LCL Operation Tips and Common Customs Clearance Issues! FCL vs. LCL Cost Comparison

Published:2026-10-21 02:35
넶Views:3

 

6 Operational Tips for LCL Shipments

1. "Consolidate" is the English term for LCL (Less than Container Load), commonly abbreviated as "consol" in international trade and transportation.
2. LCL shipments generally cannot be booked with a specific shipping line. Shipping lines only accept bookings for full container loads (FCL) and do not directly accept LCL bookings. Only through a freight forwarder (or, in the case of a few large shipping lines, through their own logistics companies) can LCL cargo be consolidated into a full container and then booked with the shipping line. Almost all LCL shipments are handled by freight forwarders through "centralized consolidation and centralized deconsolidation." In East China, the primary LCL consolidation hub is Shanghai Port. Due to limited cargo sources, most freight forwarders can only consolidate and book with a few shipping lines, making it difficult to meet requests for a specific carrier. Therefore, when finalizing an LCL transaction, try to avoid accepting a requirement for a specific shipping line to prevent issues during the booking process.
3. When negotiating and finalizing deals with customers, pay special attention to the relevant transport clauses to avoid discovering during the booking process that the L/C requirements cannot be met. In daily operations, we often encounter L/Cs that stipulate a freight forwarder's bill of lading is not acceptable for LCL shipments. Since shipping lines do not directly accept LCL bookings, the ocean bill of lading is issued to the freight forwarder, who then issues a House B/L to the shipper. If the L/C states that a forwarder's B/L is not acceptable, there is no alternative in the actual transport arrangement, leading to a discrepancy under the L/C. Another example: when arranging transport, we once saw a booking note stating: "Goods must be shipped in container on LCL basis and Bill of Lading to evidence the same and to show that all LCL handling charges, THC and delivery order charges at the port of discharge are prepaid." From this L/C wording, it is clear the consignee shifted all charges they should have borne onto the shipper. This results from the shipper and customer not negotiating the transport clauses in detail during trade discussions.

4. The chargeable tonnage for LCL shipments must be as accurate as possible. Before delivering LCL cargo, the factory should be required to measure the weight and dimensions of the goods as accurately as possible. When the cargo is delivered to the warehouse designated by the forwarder, the warehouse will usually re-measure it and use the re-measured dimensions and weight as the basis for charging. If the factory changes the packaging, they should be required to notify the forwarder promptly. Do not wait until the cargo arrives at the forwarder's warehouse and the information is fed back; by then, time is often very tight. Changing the customs declaration documents at that stage can easily delay customs clearance or incur rush declaration fees and port congestion surcharges.

5. For some ports, due to insufficient LCL cargo sources and relatively high costs, freight forwarders specializing in LCL services apply a minimum charge for shipments with small cargo volumes. For example, the minimum charge may be based on 2 freight tons, meaning any shipment less than 2 freight tons will be charged as 2 freight tons. Therefore, for shipments with small volumes or to remote ports, such factors should be fully considered when concluding a deal to avoid future complications.

6. For LCL shipments on less common routes or to remote ports where the customer requests delivery to an inland point, it is advisable to consult first before signing the contract. Confirm that there are shipping lines and freight forwarders capable of handling delivery to these remote ports and inland points, and clarify the related charges before finalizing the agreement.

 

FAQs on Consolidated Shipment Customs Declaration

When an overseas buyer purchases goods from multiple suppliers in China and consolidates them into a single container for shipment—sometimes involving two or three suppliers, and other times seven or eight—this typically requires consolidated customs declaration. Below are common issues encountered in consolidated shipment customs clearance.

1. Customs Declaration Methods – Agency Declaration vs. Buy-Out Declaration

Because the customer is purchasing from 3 or 4 different factories, some overseas buyers, in pursuit of lower prices, source from factories without import/export rights. While the prices are cheaper, these factories cannot provide customs declaration documents, so buying customs clearance documents is required. In such cases, some suppliers will handle customs declaration through an agent, while others will need to buy customs clearance documents—especially for goods requiring inspection. Therefore, it is recommended to consolidate goods with proper documentation into one container, and goods requiring bought customs clearance documents into another. Avoid, as much as possible, creating AB declarations—where part of the container is declared through an agent and part requires bought customs clearance documents, particularly for goods needing inspection but lacking the necessary certificates. Most ports do not support AB declarations; only a few in the Pearl River Delta, such as Huangpu, Yantian, and Shekou, do.

 
2. Country of Destination
Among the suppliers consolidating into one container, some use agent customs declaration for tax refund purposes, some do not require a refund and use general trade with small verification, and some need inspection with a customs clearance form. At this point, it is crucial to ensure that the country of destination on the customs declaration documents from different suppliers remains consistent.
Two common scenarios arise: 1. Documents for tax refund purposes are prepared in detail with the actual country of destination, while those for non-refund small verification casually list a different destination country, leading to inconsistencies in the customs declaration documents. 2. For shipments to inland destinations like Russia, where the port of discharge is Poland and the goods are then transshipped by rail to Russia, some customs documents may list Poland as the destination country while others list Russia, causing a mismatch. In such cases, always state the country of destination as Russia; Poland is merely the port of discharge, not the final destination.

3. Cargo Value
When consolidating, the cargo values differ. For example, there are three suppliers: A USD 40,000, B USD 40,000, and C USD 30,000.Individually, none of their cargo values exceed USD 100,000, so none of them require a special export invoice. However, because the total cargo value exceeds USD 100,000 or USD 80,000 (depending on the port), some ports require a VAT invoice. Since each factory may not be aware of the other factories' cargo values, they might not have mailed the VAT invoice in time, and resending it could delay the customs declaration process.

When consolidating a container, the cargo values may differ. For example, there are three parties: A with USD 140,000, B with USD 40,000, and C with USD 30,000.
The total cargo value exceeds USD 100,000. Since A alone exceeds USD 100,000, A must also provide a special export invoice, while the others only need to provide VAT invoices.
4. LCL Quantity
Generally, the number of consolidated shipments in one container does not exceed 8, and in some locations it is limited to 4. If a supplier sources from over a dozen factories and all of them have customs declaration documents, then all those documents must be combined for a single container declaration. Typically, customs supports a maximum of 8 consolidated shipments.
V. Difference Between Tax Refund and Non-Refund

Among three suppliers, two require a tax refund and one does not, with the total cargo value exceeding 100,000. Previously, only the two refund-eligible factories needed to provide VAT invoices and special export invoices. Now, the non-refund factory is also required to provide a special export invoice.

VI. Container Door Sealing

Due to the large volume of goods, to avoid confusion during customs inspection, it is best to remember which cargo is loaded right at the container door.

7. Consolidating Multiple Containers
Sometimes a supplier has a large volume of goods that may require loading into two containers.
1. In this case, ensure that goods from the same supplier are loaded into one container. Avoid splitting a single supplier's cargo with a few cubic meters in Container A and a few in Container B. If the container cannot be fully loaded and the cargo must be split into two containers, an additional set of customs declaration documents must be prepared.
2. Commodity inspection certificates must correspond correctly. For example, with three suppliers A, B, and C: Supplier A has 70 CBM, B has 18 CBM, and C has 8 CBM. A high-cube container holds 50 CBM from A and 18 CBM from B, while a smaller container holds the remaining 20 CBM from A and 8 CBM from C. For this arrangement, Supplier A needs to prepare two separate commodity inspection certificates.
3. Decide whether to declare the containers jointly or separately. With a joint declaration, if one container is selected for inspection and the other is not, both containers will be held and cannot be loaded onto the vessel. With separate declarations, the container under inspection will wait for the next available sailing, while the released container can be shipped as scheduled.

FCL vs. LCL Ocean Freight Costs: Which Is Higher?

FCL and LCL
In container shipping, cargo that meets the "four ones" condition — one container, one exporter, one consignee, and one destination port — is referred to as Full Container Load (FCL). If any one of the three elements — exporter, consignee, or destination port — involves two or more parties within a single container, the shipment is defined as Less than Container Load (LCL).

The transport costs for LCL and FCL differ significantly, not only in procedures but also in time and expense. The relationship between them is by no means a simple "1+1=2, 1+2=3" arithmetic sum, but rather a series of peculiar "inequalities" such as "1+1>2, 1+2>3."

 

LCL shipments involve more complex customs clearance procedures and take longer than FCL shipments

 

First, FCL shipments align perfectly with the minimum unit required for customs inspection, sealing, and release in both exporting and importing countries. As long as the exporter and importer submit complete, legitimate, and accurate documentation, and the relevant customs procedures and duties are completed, both export and import customs will typically clear and release the goods promptly. For LCL shipments, however, the process is far less straightforward and quick. If there is any discrepancy in the documentation for even one consignment within the container, the export customs will not release the shipment. This is because export customs must seal the container properly before allowing it to depart. Consequently, if any single consignment in the same container fails to clear customs, it will inevitably delay the timely export and transport of all other goods in that container.

Second, LCL cargo is far less flexible and has a narrower sourcing scope compared to FCL cargo. It requires the transport company to actively solicit and carefully consolidate export goods that are compatible in terms of port of loading, port of destination, delivery schedule, cargo type, volume, weight, and other conditions to fit into the same container. Meeting these requirements is highly challenging and often takes considerable time. If the freight forwarder entrusted by the shipper lacks strong operational capabilities, the transit time for the goods may be prolonged even further.
Third, Generally, FCL cargo can be loaded directly at inland ports, whereas LCL cargo, due to relatively limited inland supply and more abundant coastal supply, is typically only suitable for delivery at well-developed coastal ports. This undoubtedly adds considerable extra inconvenience for the exporter. According to relevant regulations of the Chinese government, export goods must be inspected by the commodity inspection authority at the place of production and the place of export customs declaration. If the goods are declared for export locally within the province (autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government) where they are produced, only one commodity inspection is required for the batch. Otherwise, if the declaration is made in a different location, a batch of export goods subject to statutory inspection must undergo two separate inspections before customs will grant release.
 

 

LCL Costs More Than FCL

 

Typically, the freight and related charges for FCL (Full Container Load) ocean shipments include three components: ocean freight, freight surcharges, and port service charges. The ocean freight and surcharges for LCL (Less than Container Load) shipments should be the same as those for FCL. The cost difference lies only in the consolidation of cargo at the port of loading and the deconsolidation at the port of destination.

Logically, these two charges should not be very high. However, labor costs vary greatly from country to country and region to region, and exporters often know little or nothing about these specific differences. It would be reasonable for LCL freight and related charges to be based on the overall FCL cost plus a certain percentage for consolidation, deconsolidation, and warehousing. But to earn higher profits, carriers often employ vague pricing tactics. Their quotations do not itemize specific charges; instead, they simply quote a lump-sum rate per freight ton for a particular commodity to a particular destination. Port service charges are even more arbitrarily quoted on the spot, and whatever figure is given is final. The carrier has no obligation to explain, and the shipper has no room to negotiate—the charges depend entirely on the circumstances.

Furthermore, it should be noted that in import and export trade, the larger the quantity and total value of each transaction, the lower the transaction cost. Conversely, the smaller the quantity and total value, the higher the transaction cost.

Compared with FCL, LCL shipments generally involve smaller quantities and total values. Therefore, from this perspective, the transaction cost for LCL is certainly higher than for FCL. This is because costs such as sample fees and postage, fax and telephone communication charges, L/C notification fees, import/export customs clearance fees, and certificate of origin issuance fees are all charged per document rather than based on the transaction value. When these operational costs are ultimately allocated to the transaction cost, larger-volume shipments bear a smaller share per unit, while smaller-volume shipments bear a larger share per unit. We should keep this clearly in mind.

 

 
"Aopai International" Official Website:

www.opcargo.com